It was a valid question. Town get absorbed by different Princes or other
towns. It's very confusing.
From hannover-l-admin Fri Jun 2 22:59:29 2000
Received: from mx.buergernetz-erft.de (mx.buergernetz-erft.de [212.72.79.197])
by list.buergernetz-erft.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA67536
for <hannover-l@list.buergernetz-erft.de>; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 22:59:28 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from hannover-l-admin@retsys.eics.com)
Received: from ns.eics.com (ns.eics.com [212.72.79.193])
by mx.buergernetz-erft.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA29408
for <hannover-l@list.buergernetz-erft.de>; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 22:51:18 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from hannover-l-admin@retsys.eics.com)
Received: from retsys.eics.com (retsys.eics.com [212.72.79.194])
by ns.eics.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA11915
for <hannover-l@list.buergernetz-erft.de>; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 23:31:44 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from hannover-l-admin@retsys.eics.com)
Received: from mx.buergernetz-erft.de (mx.buergernetz-erft.de [212.72.79.197]) by retsys.eics.com (8.8.5/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA18902 for <hannover-l@genealogy.net>; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 22:54:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com (mailout03.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.81])
by mx.buergernetz-erft.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA29400
for <hannover-l@genealogy.net>; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 22:51:14 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from Walter.Hoffmeister@t-online.de)
Received: from fwd07.sul.t-online.de
by mailout03.sul.t-online.com with smtp
id 12xyRU-0003oW-00; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 22:53:20 +0200
Received: from bigblue (320089251214-0001@[62.224.101.248]) by fwd07.sul.t-online.de
with smtp id 12xyRM-0fkgPgC; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 22:53:12 +0200
Message-ID: <000b01bfccd4$c1e7f300$f865e03e@bigblue>